Pacific Small Arms Action Group
  • Our Work
  • Blog
  • Publications
    • Reinvigorating the Narrative: the Broader Benefits of the Arms Trade Treaty
    • Implementing the Arms Trade Treaty and the UNPoA
    • All Publications
  • Resources
    • Useful Resources
    • Find Out More With Our Partners
    • The Current State of Play: ATT & UNPoA
  • About PSAAG
    • PSAAG’s Members
  • Contact Us
  • Our Work
  • Blog
  • Publications
    • Reinvigorating the Narrative: the Broader Benefits of the Arms Trade Treaty
    • Implementing the Arms Trade Treaty and the UNPoA
    • All Publications
  • Resources
    • Useful Resources
    • Find Out More With Our Partners
    • The Current State of Play: ATT & UNPoA
  • About PSAAG
    • PSAAG’s Members
  • Contact Us
27/02/2017 In Arms Trade Treaty, Blog, Caribbean, Pacific, UNPoA

5 Challenges to Implementing International Arms Controls Standards in Small Island Developing States

Laura Spano, CAVR
Laura Spano, CAVR

The Centre for Armed Violence Reduction (CAVR) has a soft spot for small island developing states (SIDs). I mean who wouldn’t – beautiful blue expanding oceans, green rolling hills and hospitable smiles for days. This is the very reason why we work with these states – to keep them beautiful and free of insecurity that the flow that illicit small arms and light weapons (SALW) brings. In the Pacific, SALWs have not proliferated to an uncontrollable level and we would like to keep it that way. We focus on prevention and building a strong arms control system to keep people safe. In the Caribbean, some islands have unfortunately been devastated by the proliferation of arms. Reduction measures are essential, but so is ensuring a strong enforcement system.

Quick facts about the regions:

  • They both consist of several thousand islands, which are difficult to patrol.
  • They both consist of states who do not manufacture and import only small amounts of small arms and light weapons.
  • Transit/transhipment is the most common arms transfer that takes place within both regions.

PSAAG was recently in the Caribbean working with CARICOM Member States. Here are five key challenges both regions share in building stronger arms control systems, although sometimes these challenges spring from different sources.

  1. Outdated legislation & procedures – In both regions, states need to review their legislation and procedures. Common gaps exist – lack of brokering laws and weak penalties. Both regions are fortunate to have a ATT model legislation as a reference point to improve the gaps that expose them to vulnerabilities.
  2. Lack of coordinating agency/National Point of Contact (NPC) – In both regions, several states have not identified an agency responsible for coordinating all aspects of improving arms control measures aimed to prevent and control the proliferation of SALW. Or the responsibility has not been formalised. Similarly, many government officials across government agencies do not know who their national point of contact is on arms control. In many cases this is because a NPC does not exist or the role has not been communicated to key stakeholders. Officials across agencies in both regions are calling for increased awareness on international arms control standards and coordination amongst all relevant stakeholders.
  3. Porous Borders/Training Customs Officers – In both regions, the porous borders and vast oceans mean customs officers play a key role in protecting their borders from illicit flows of SALW. However, with limited human resources and lack of surveillance and x-ray equipment, customs officers do not always feel well equipped to do their job. Customs officers have called for more training on international standards on the transfers of SALWs, cross-border collaboration and how to identify parts and components. Of particular importance are controls to improve the transit/transhipment process, a common type of transfer of arms in both regions and a transfer vulnerable to diversion of arms.
  4. Resources and Capacity – The Pacific has suffered from arms leakages from state forces. The Caribbean has suffered from its geographical location to trading routes and sometimes poor law enforcement. Both suffer from low resource and human capacity to implement effective control measures. It is impossible to patrol all their islands, borders and ocean territory. With limited resources states, in both regions, must prioritise the work of their personnel. This means arms control issues are not always priority. Therefore, control measures that are implemented must be appropriate to the capacity and resource constrains. The importance of effective arms control systems must also be linked to more prioritised issues such as sustainable development.
  5. Reporting – Both regions have low reporting rates. The Pacific has the lowest reporting rate of the UN Programme of Action on Small Arms and Light Weapons and many Caribbean states have not yet lived up to their ATT obligations of submitting annual reports. In many cases, the challenge is again resources. Automated and centralised information management systems do not exist. Reporting requires personnel to spend several hours going agency-to-agency to verify data. Understanding the challenge, a number of states in both regions are now prioritising the implementation of an automated registry to improve controls over what flows across their border and to systematic reporting process.

Whilst there are many arms control issues facing small island developing states, they can be overcome. The Centre for Armed Violence Reduction is currently working with governments around the world to ensure arms control standards are localised to their needs.

Laura Spano, Arms Control Manager, Centre for Armed Violence Reduction (CAVR). CAVR is the Secretariat of the Pacific Small Arms Action Group (PSAAG). Laura recently spent two weeks in Antigua and Barbuda and Trinidad and Tobago working with CARICOM, UNIDIR and ATT-BAP to build the capacity of government officials to strengthen their national coordinating mechanisms.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...
Arms Control Arms Trade Treaty Caribbean Pacific
Previous StoryAdvancing PNG’s Arm’s Control System
Next StoryThird Conference of States Parties to the Arms Trade Treaty

Leave your comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest Posts

  • Diseño sin título
    ABC Radio Interviews the Director of GunPolicy.Org: ‘The Pacific is Not Immune from Gun Violence’ Monday, 8, Oct
  • CSP4 Logo
    Next Week in Tokyo: Pacific States Will Join the Global Debate on the Arms Trade Treaty (CSP4) Thursday, 16, Aug
  • RevCon3 IANSA Wear Orange Group Photo
    Can the RevCon3 deliver a GENDER-sensitive outcome? Wednesday, 27, Jun
  • ATT 2
    ATT CSP3 Thursday, 17, May

Categories

Archives

  • August 2019
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • December 2014
  • December 2013
  • December 2012
  • December 2011
  • December 2010
  • December 2009

About

PSAAG is a network of NGOs and other organisations which work to reduce armed violence and prevent small arms proliferation in the Pacific

WHO WE ARE

  • About
  • Our Members
  • Contact Us

WHAT WE DO

  • Our Work
  • Blog
  • Publications

ABOUT US

PSAAG is a network of NGOs and other organisations which work to reduce armed violence and prevent small arms proliferation in the Pacific

Copyright © Pacific Small Arms Action Group 2015. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: